Differences between revisions 15 and 96 (spanning 81 versions)
Revision 15 as of 2012-05-01 21:31:14
Size: 3597
Editor: WikiUpdater
Comment: auto-update by eldersTally.py, version 1.0.0
Revision 96 as of 2013-07-18 07:17:09
Size: 5662
Editor: JohnHurst
Comment:
Deletions are marked like this. Additions are marked like this.
Line 5: Line 5:
This table is current for 02 May 2012 at 07:30
|| Name ||<-2:> Number of Duties ||
|| || last 52 weeks || next 52 weeks ||
|| AlanBarnard ||<:> 9 ||<:> 11 ||
|| BarbaraKrieger ||<:> 9 ||<:> 10 ||
|| BelindaChung ||<:> 1 ||<:> 14 ||
|| BelindaClear ||<:> 4 ||<:> 17 ||
|| BevRichardson ||<:> 13 ||<:> 11 ||
|| BeverlyMcGlead ||<:> 12 ||<:> 12 ||
|| DavidJackson ||<:> 12 ||<:> 12 ||
|| DougNewberry ||<:> 5 ||<:> 13 ||
|| ElwynPederson ||<:> 7 ||<:> 0 ||
|| [[GaelOBrien]] ||<:> 7 ||<:> 12 ||
|| GailIrvine ||<:> 1 ||<:> 14 ||
|| GeraldineFleming ||<:> 8 ||<:> 12 ||
|| GlennLaub ||<:> 14 ||<:> 11 ||
|| GraemeFrecker ||<:> 12 ||<:> 12 ||
|| GrahamLockhart ||<:> 1 ||<:> 0 ||
|| HerbFleming ||<:> 12 ||<:> 0 ||
|| IanMcMillan ||<:> 9 ||<:> 11 ||
|| JanClear ||<:> 11 ||<:> 12 ||
|| JitTan ||<:> 11 ||<:> 11 ||
|| JohnBattisson ||<:> 2 ||<:> 0 ||
|| JohnHurst ||<:> 11 ||<:> 13 ||
|| JohnKenez ||<:> 4 ||<:> 0 ||
|| JonathanChong ||<:> 9 ||<:> 12 ||
|| JoyJackson ||<:> 12 ||<:> 12 ||
|| JudyLowe ||<:> 9 ||<:> 12 ||
|| KayeMackinnon ||<:> 5 ||<:> 11 ||
|| KayeMorgan ||<:> 6 ||<:> 16 ||
|| KenDevos ||<:> 14 ||<:> 12 ||
|| LaurelMuir ||<:> 9 ||<:> 12 ||
|| LoisHosking ||<:> 6 ||<:> 12 ||
|| MargaretDuncan ||<:> 9 ||<:> 12 ||
|| MargaretFraser ||<:> 6 ||<:> 11 ||
|| MarjorieBedford ||<:> 11 ||<:> 12 ||
|| MarkEaston ||<:> 0 ||<:> 14 ||
|| MichaelPatterson ||<:> 6 ||<:> 12 ||
|| PeterBarr ||<:> 10 ||<:> 0 ||
|| PeterThorpe ||<:> 3 ||<:> 0 ||
|| RossMackinnon ||<:> 4 ||<:> 11 ||
|| ShirleyHarding ||<:> 9 ||<:> 12 ||
|| SueMorgan ||<:> 9 ||<:> 10 ||
Numbers in parentheses are vestry duties.
This table is current for 17 Jul 2013 at 00:40
|| Name ||<-3:> Number of Duties(vestry) ||
|| || last 52 weeks || next 52 weeks || total tally || percent last || percent next ||
|| ! ||<:> 0 ||<:> 3 ||<:> 3 ||<:>-||<:> 1.38||
|| AlisonBarr ||<:> 1(1) ||<:> 0(0) ||<:> 1(1) ||<:> 0.26||<:>-||
|| AlisonClarkson ||<:> 2 ||<:> 0 ||<:> 2 ||<:> 0.52||<:>-||
|| BarbaraKrieger ||<:> 11 ||<:> 8 ||<:> 19 ||<:> 2.84||<:> 3.67||
|| BelindaChung ||<:> 14 ||<:> 8 ||<:> 22 ||<:> 3.61||<:> 3.67||
|| BelindaClear ||<:> 14(1) ||<:> 8(0) ||<:> 22(1) ||<:> 3.61||<:> 3.67||
|| BevRichardson ||<:> 12(4) ||<:> 6(2) ||<:> 18(6) ||<:> 3.09||<:> 2.75||
|| BeverlyMcGlead ||<:> 9(2) ||<:> 9(0) ||<:> 18(2) ||<:> 2.32||<:> 4.13||
|| DavidMorgan ||<:> 7 ||<:> 9 ||<:> 16 ||<:> 1.80||<:> 4.13||
|| DougNewberry ||<:> 13(1) ||<:> 6(3) ||<:> 19(4) ||<:> 3.35||<:> 2.75||
|| [[GaelO'Brien]] ||<:> 14(7) ||<:> 5(2) ||<:> 19(9) ||<:> 3.61||<:> 2.29||
|| GailIrvine ||<:> 15 ||<:> 8 ||<:> 23 ||<:> 3.87||<:> 3.67||
|| GeraldineFleming ||<:> 12(5) ||<:> 6(2) ||<:> 18(7) ||<:> 3.09||<:> 2.75||
|| GlennLaub ||<:> 10(2) ||<:> 5(3) ||<:> 15(5) ||<:> 2.58||<:> 2.29||
|| GraemeFrecker ||<:> 10(5) ||<:> 6(4) ||<:> 16(9) ||<:> 2.58||<:> 2.75||
|| HeatherHon ||<:> 12(3) ||<:> 9(0) ||<:> 21(3) ||<:> 3.09||<:> 4.13||
|| HerbFleming ||<:> 3(3) ||<:> 4(4) ||<:> 7(7) ||<:> 0.77||<:> 1.83||
|| IanMcMillan ||<:> 10(3) ||<:> 6(1) ||<:> 16(4) ||<:> 2.58||<:> 2.75||
|| JanClear ||<:> 10(5) ||<:> 5(4) ||<:> 15(9) ||<:> 2.58||<:> 2.29||
|| JitTan ||<:> 11(6) ||<:> 6(2) ||<:> 17(8) ||<:> 2.84||<:> 2.75||
|| JohnHurst ||<:> 13(6) ||<:> 4(3) ||<:> 17(9) ||<:> 3.35||<:> 1.83||
|| JonathanChong ||<:> 9(4) ||<:> 6(3) ||<:> 15(7) ||<:> 2.32||<:> 2.75||
|| JudyLowe ||<:> 10(4) ||<:> 6(3) ||<:> 16(7) ||<:> 2.58||<:> 2.75||
|| KayeMackinnon ||<:> 11(1) ||<:> 6(1) ||<:> 17(2) ||<:> 2.84||<:> 2.75||
|| KayeMorgan ||<:> 13 ||<:> 9 ||<:> 22 ||<:> 3.35||<:> 4.13||
|| KenDevos ||<:> 11(6) ||<:> 5(4) ||<:> 16(10) ||<:> 2.84||<:> 2.29||
|| LaurelMuir ||<:> 10(4) ||<:> 7(1) ||<:> 17(5) ||<:> 2.58||<:> 3.21||
|| LoisHosking ||<:> 12(2) ||<:> 6(0) ||<:> 18(2) ||<:> 3.09||<:> 2.75||
|| LynneBoyer ||<:> 9 ||<:> 8 ||<:> 17 ||<:> 2.32||<:> 3.67||
|| MargaretDuncan ||<:> 9 ||<:> 0 ||<:> 9 ||<:> 2.32||<:>-||
|| MargaretFraser ||<:> 10(4) ||<:> 7(0) ||<:> 17(4) ||<:> 2.58||<:> 3.21||
|| MarjorieBedford ||<:> 9(4) ||<:> 0(0) ||<:> 9(4) ||<:> 2.32||<:>-||
|| MarkEaston ||<:> 13(1) ||<:> 8(0) ||<:> 21(1) ||<:> 3.35||<:> 3.67||
|| MikePatterson ||<:> 10 ||<:> 0 ||<:> 10 ||<:> 2.58||<:>-||
|| PeterStewart ||<:> 6(1) ||<:> 3(0) ||<:> 9(1) ||<:> 1.55||<:> 1.38||
|| RossMackinnon ||<:> 11 ||<:> 8 ||<:> 19 ||<:> 2.84||<:> 3.67||
|| ShirleyHarding ||<:> 13 ||<:> 8 ||<:> 21 ||<:> 3.35||<:> 3.67||
|| SueMorgan ||<:> 10(3) ||<:> 6(5) ||<:> 16(8) ||<:> 2.58||<:> 2.75||
|| VidaFoo ||<:> 9(4) ||<:> 4(4) ||<:> 13(8) ||<:> 2.32||<:> 1.83||
|| averages ||<:> 10.21 ||<:> 6.41 ||<:> 15.54 ||<:> 2.63 ||<:> 2.94 ||
Line 51: Line 52:
This table is generated by analyzing the past 52 weeks of duties (you
can see this at EldersRosterPrevious), together with the next 52 weeks
of (allocated) duties (you can see this at RosterEldersCurrent). Each
welcoming, vestry or communion duty constitutes 1 duty, and these are
tallied for each elder. Note that some elders have been withdrawn
from the rosters for various reasons, so these will have zero tallies
for the forthcoming 52 weeks.
This table is generated by analyzing the past 52 weeks of duties (you can see this at EldersRosterPrevious), together with the next 52 weeks of (allocated) duties (you can see this at RosterEldersCurrent). Each welcoming, vestry or communion duty constitutes 1 duty, and these are tallied for each elder. Note that some elders have been withdrawn from the rosters for various reasons, so these will have zero tallies for the forthcoming 52 weeks.
Line 59: Line 54:
The roster allocation program attempts to keep the number of duties
even across all elders, according to their preferences. This table
therefore gives a rough indication of how well the roster allocation
is working. Variations between elders may arise because of those
preferences. For example, relatively few elders have expressed a
preference for 4:30 and 7:00pm services, so they may allocated more
frequently, and hence have higher tallies than average. Elders who
are absent for long periods of the year may also have fewer
allocations than average
.
The roster allocation program attempts to keep the number of duties even across all elders, according to their preferences (see EldersRosterPreferences). This table therefore gives a rough indication of how well the roster allocation is working. Variations between elders may arise because of those preferences. For example, relatively few elders have expressed a preference for 4:30 and 7:00pm services, so they may allocated more frequently, and hence have higher tallies than average. Elders who are absent for long periods of the year may also have fewer allocations than average.

The last two columns of the t
able show the individual percentage contributions. The closer these are to the average percentages shown at the bottom of the column, the better the allocation process is performing.

The last row of the table shows the averages for the previous and next 52 weeks, NOT counting zero entries. Note how the average has risen, reflecting the fact that a) there are (slightl
y) more duties, and b) fewer elders to perform them.
Line 70: Line 61:
~- This page automatically generated by eldersTally v1.0.0 on 2012-05-02 07:30:41.959931 -~ ~- This page automatically generated by eldersTally v1.0.0 on 2013-07-17 00:40:10.570188 -~

Elders Duties Tally

This page details the number of elders duties perfomed over the last 52 weeks, and the next 52 weeks. The forward tally is of course dependent upon the allocations remaining stable. Numbers in parentheses are vestry duties. This table is current for 17 Jul 2013 at 00:40

Name

Number of Duties(vestry)

last 52 weeks

next 52 weeks

total tally

percent last

percent next

!

0

3

3

-

1.38

AlisonBarr

1(1)

0(0)

1(1)

0.26

-

AlisonClarkson

2

0

2

0.52

-

BarbaraKrieger

11

8

19

2.84

3.67

BelindaChung

14

8

22

3.61

3.67

BelindaClear

14(1)

8(0)

22(1)

3.61

3.67

BevRichardson

12(4)

6(2)

18(6)

3.09

2.75

BeverlyMcGlead

9(2)

9(0)

18(2)

2.32

4.13

DavidMorgan

7

9

16

1.80

4.13

DougNewberry

13(1)

6(3)

19(4)

3.35

2.75

GaelO'Brien

14(7)

5(2)

19(9)

3.61

2.29

GailIrvine

15

8

23

3.87

3.67

GeraldineFleming

12(5)

6(2)

18(7)

3.09

2.75

GlennLaub

10(2)

5(3)

15(5)

2.58

2.29

GraemeFrecker

10(5)

6(4)

16(9)

2.58

2.75

HeatherHon

12(3)

9(0)

21(3)

3.09

4.13

HerbFleming

3(3)

4(4)

7(7)

0.77

1.83

IanMcMillan

10(3)

6(1)

16(4)

2.58

2.75

JanClear

10(5)

5(4)

15(9)

2.58

2.29

JitTan

11(6)

6(2)

17(8)

2.84

2.75

JohnHurst

13(6)

4(3)

17(9)

3.35

1.83

JonathanChong

9(4)

6(3)

15(7)

2.32

2.75

JudyLowe

10(4)

6(3)

16(7)

2.58

2.75

KayeMackinnon

11(1)

6(1)

17(2)

2.84

2.75

KayeMorgan

13

9

22

3.35

4.13

KenDevos

11(6)

5(4)

16(10)

2.84

2.29

LaurelMuir

10(4)

7(1)

17(5)

2.58

3.21

LoisHosking

12(2)

6(0)

18(2)

3.09

2.75

LynneBoyer

9

8

17

2.32

3.67

MargaretDuncan

9

0

9

2.32

-

MargaretFraser

10(4)

7(0)

17(4)

2.58

3.21

MarjorieBedford

9(4)

0(0)

9(4)

2.32

-

MarkEaston

13(1)

8(0)

21(1)

3.35

3.67

MikePatterson

10

0

10

2.58

-

PeterStewart

6(1)

3(0)

9(1)

1.55

1.38

RossMackinnon

11

8

19

2.84

3.67

ShirleyHarding

13

8

21

3.35

3.67

SueMorgan

10(3)

6(5)

16(8)

2.58

2.75

VidaFoo

9(4)

4(4)

13(8)

2.32

1.83

averages

10.21

6.41

15.54

2.63

2.94

Explanation

This table is generated by analyzing the past 52 weeks of duties (you can see this at EldersRosterPrevious), together with the next 52 weeks of (allocated) duties (you can see this at RosterEldersCurrent). Each welcoming, vestry or communion duty constitutes 1 duty, and these are tallied for each elder. Note that some elders have been withdrawn from the rosters for various reasons, so these will have zero tallies for the forthcoming 52 weeks.

The roster allocation program attempts to keep the number of duties even across all elders, according to their preferences (see EldersRosterPreferences). This table therefore gives a rough indication of how well the roster allocation is working. Variations between elders may arise because of those preferences. For example, relatively few elders have expressed a preference for 4:30 and 7:00pm services, so they may allocated more frequently, and hence have higher tallies than average. Elders who are absent for long periods of the year may also have fewer allocations than average.

The last two columns of the table show the individual percentage contributions. The closer these are to the average percentages shown at the bottom of the column, the better the allocation process is performing.

The last row of the table shows the averages for the previous and next 52 weeks, NOT counting zero entries. Note how the average has risen, reflecting the fact that a) there are (slightly) more duties, and b) fewer elders to perform them.

This page automatically generated by eldersTally v1.0.0 on 2013-07-17 00:40:10.570188


CategoryElders

EldersDutyTally (last edited 2013-08-21 08:42:23 by WikiUpdater)