Differences between revisions 1 and 3 (spanning 2 versions)
Revision 1 as of 2017-08-30 07:16:40
Size: 1008
Editor: DavidMorgan
Comment:
Revision 3 as of 2017-08-30 07:23:50
Size: 1062
Editor: DavidMorgan
Comment: Typo
Deletions are marked like this. Additions are marked like this.
Line 1: Line 1:
## page was renamed from ChairProces20170830
Line 14: Line 15:
   * We could form a "chair group" of people who might be prepared to stand in till February; Helen would assist them for the rest of the year.    * We could form a "chair group" of people who might be prepared to stand for election in February; Helen would assist them for the rest of the year.

Chair election process

  • Situation
    • Unusual situation of a Council of mainly new members. Electing a new member as chair has difficulties, both for their understanding of the job and the meeting's ability to discern their potential.
    • Council has traditionally chosen new office bearers in February each year, so we do have the option of re-visiting office bearers then, or of choosing a transitional arrangement until then.
    • Previous office bearers are keen to help the new Council to establish itself.
    • The decision rests with this group.

  • Suggested "Decision tree".
    • Do we want to restrict nominations to continuing or renewing (not new) members?
    • Do we have a candidate from that group?
    • Do we want to consider a transitional arrangement?
      • We could coopt Helen until Feb. She has agreed.
      • We could form a "chair group" of people who might be prepared to stand for election in February; Helen would assist them for the rest of the year.

CouncilChairProcess20170830 (last edited 2021-07-04 04:30:21 by DavidMorgan)